The summary is wrong when paid by one and split between others
Bradley Bernard
Hi Dani, thanks for the post. I do think the wording is slightly confusing here, technically it's 3 people since you paid and you are owed from the other two (3 people in total), but the split is equal between the two splitters. I have been facing this for some time, I'm not sure what I'd like to go with here... it's a relatively simple change, but I can see both explanations being valuable to different people
Dani Asztalos
Bradley Bernard thanks for the reply. I can see your reasoning, but then it is confusing to see two expenses where
- I paid for 2 other people
- I paid for myself and 2 other people
both show with = 3.
Bradley Bernard
Dani Asztalos: Both of those have 3 people, unless I'm not understanding your expenses. The # is the # of people involved, number of distinct users across payers and owers.
Dani Asztalos
Yes, you understand it correctly. It is just confusing to see both expenses say "split equally between 3 people"
Bradley Bernard
Dani Asztalos: Yeah realistically it would be split between two people and paid by another person, I could make that change, but will sit on it for a bit, thanks for the feedback!